Understanding Chemical Nature of Oxides Characteristics

Chemical Nature of Oxides: Fundamental Definitions and Classification

The reactivity of an oxide is primarily governed by the electronegativity of the central atom and the oxide’s ability to donate or accept protons (Brønsted-Lowry theory) or electron pairs (Lewis theory). Acidic oxides typically form from nonmetals or metals in high oxidation states, while basic oxides derive from electropositive metals. Amphoteric oxides exhibit dual behavior, reacting with both acids and bases, whereas neutral oxides show minimal reactivity under standard conditions.

Classification of Oxides Based on Chemical Behavior

Decision-Making Flowchart for Oxide Classification

1. Test Reactivity with Water:

2. Test Reactivity with Acids:

3. Test Reactivity with Bases:

Example Pathway:

Examples of Oxides and Their Classification Justifications

• Carbon Dioxide (CO₂)
  • Classification: Acidic oxide.
  • Justification:

    CO₂ is a linear molecule with carbon in the +4 oxidation state, exhibiting high electronegativity. It reacts with water to form carbonic acid (H₂CO₃), a weak acid, and neutralizes bases to produce carbonates (e.g., CO₂ + 2NaOH → Na₂CO₃ + H₂O).

• Calcium Oxide (CaO)
  • Classification: Basic oxide.
  • Justification:

    CaO consists of Ca²⁺ and O²⁻ ions, with calcium’s low electronegativity (0.9) and high ionic character. It reacts vigorously with water to form calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂), a strong base, and neutralizes acids to form salts (e.g., CaO + 2HCl → CaCl₂ + H₂O).

• Aluminum Oxide (Al₂O₃)
  • Classification: Amphoteric oxide.
  • Justification:

    Al₂O₃ exhibits dual behavior due to aluminum’s intermediate electronegativity (1.6). It reacts with hydrochloric acid to form aluminum chloride (Al₂O₃ + 6HCl → 2AlCl₃ + 3H₂O) and with sodium hydroxide to form sodium aluminate (Al₂O₃ + 2NaOH + 3H₂O → 2Na[Al(OH)₄]). This dual reactivity is exploited in refining aluminum via the Bayer process.

  

  Reactivity Patterns of Oxides: Experimental Observations and Theoretical Models

  The chemical behavior of oxides is governed by systematic trends in electronegativity, oxidation states, and periodic table positioning, enabling predictive classification of their acidic, basic, or amphoteric nature. Experimental validation of these theoretical frameworks involves controlled reactions with protic solvents (e.g., water) or acids/bases, revealing distinct reactivity patterns. This section integrates electronegativity-based predictions with hands-on laboratory procedures to elucidate how structural and electronic factors dictate oxide reactivity.
  

  Electronegativity Trends and Acidic/Basic Nature of Oxides

  The acidic or basic character of an oxide is primarily determined by the electronegativity difference between the central atom and oxygen, as well as the polarity of the metal-oxygen or non-metal-oxygen bond. Non-metal oxides (e.g., CO₂, SO₃) exhibit high electronegativity for the central atom, leading to polar covalent bonds where oxygen’s partial negative charge attracts protons (H⁺) from water, yielding acidic solutions. Conversely, metal oxides (e.g., Na₂O, CaO) feature ionic or highly polar bonds, where the metal cation stabilizes hydroxide ions (OH⁻) upon dissolution, resulting in basicity.
  

  Key Principle:
  

  Non-metal oxides (EN > 2.0): Acidic (e.g., Cl₂O₇, P₄O₁₀).

  Metal oxides (EN < 1.7): Basic (e.g., K₂O, BaO).

  Intermediate EN (1.7–2.0): Amphoteric (e.g., Al₂O₃, ZnO).

  Across the periodic table, electronegativity increases left-to-right and bottom-to-top, correlating with oxide acidity. For example:
  
  • Group 1/2 metals (e.g., Na, Mg): Low EN → basic oxides (e.g., Na₂O + H₂O → 2NaOH).
  • Group 14–17 non-metals (e.g., C, S): High EN → acidic oxides (e.g., SO₃ + H₂O → H₂SO₄).
  • Transition metals: Variable EN and multiple oxidation states lead to mixed behavior (e.g., CrO₃ is acidic; Cr₂O₃ is amphoteric).

  Laboratory Procedure: Testing pH Changes of Oxides in Water

  This experiment quantifies the acidic/basic nature of oxides by measuring pH changes upon dissolution. Safety Note: Handle concentrated acids/bases and oxides (e.g., CaO) with gloves and goggles; perform reactions in a fume hood for volatile oxides (e.g., CO₂). Use distilled water and calibrated pH meters for accuracy.

  Materials Required:
  

  • Oxides: CO₂ (solid dry ice or gaseous source), CaO (quicklime), Al₂O₃ (alumina).
  • Equipment: pH meter, magnetic stirrer, 100 mL beakers, pipettes, universal indicator paper.
  • Reagents: Distilled water, 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH.

  Step-by-Step Protocol:
  1. Preparation of Oxide Suspensions:
  

  • For CO₂: Bubble CO₂ gas through 50 mL distilled water until saturated (~pH 4–5).
  • For CaO: Add 1 g CaO to 50 mL water in a stirred beaker (exothermic; use ice bath if necessary).
  • For Al₂O₃: Suspend 1 g Al₂O₃ in 50 mL water; heat gently to 60°C to enhance solubility.

  2. pH Measurement:
  

  • Record initial pH of distilled water (neutral, pH 7).
  • Stir each oxide suspension for 10 minutes, then measure pH:
  • CO₂ solution: pH < 3 (acidic, forms H₂CO₃).
  • CaO solution: pH > 12 (basic, forms Ca(OH)₂).
  • Al₂O₃ suspension: pH 7–9 (amphoteric; partial dissolution yields Al(OH)₃).

  3. Control Reactions:
  

  • Add 5 mL 0.1 M HCl to each suspension; observe effervescence (CO₂) or precipitation (Al(OH)₃).
  • Add 5 mL 0.1 M NaOH to CaO suspension; no reaction (excess OH⁻). For Al₂O₃, dissolution occurs with excess NaOH (forms soluble [Al(OH)₄]⁻).

  Expected Observations Table:
  

  Oxide	Expected Reaction with HCl	Expected Reaction with NaOH
  CO₂ (Acidic)	No visible reaction (already acidic; may form H₂CO₃ → CO₂ gas evolution if concentrated HCl added).	Neutralization: CO₂ + 2NaOH → Na₂CO₃ + H₂O.
  CaO (Basic)	Neutralization: CaO + 2HCl → CaCl₂ + H₂O (exothermic, clear solution).	No reaction (excess OH⁻; Ca(OH)₂ is sparingly soluble).
  Al₂O₃ (Amphoteric)	Acidic dissolution: Al₂O₃ + 6HCl → 2AlCl₃ + 3H₂O (colorless solution).	Basic dissolution: Al₂O₃ + 2NaOH + 3H₂O → 2Na[Al(OH)₄] (colorless, soluble complex).

  Oxidation States and Their Influence on Oxide Behavior

  The oxidation state of the central atom in an oxide directly affects its bond polarity, electron density, and reactivity. Higher oxidation states (e.g., Mn in Mn₂O₇ vs. MnO) correlate with increased acidity due to greater electron withdrawal from oxygen, stabilizing anionic species (e.g., MnO₄⁻). Conversely, lower oxidation states (e.g., Cr in Cr₂O₃) favor basic or amphoteric behavior by localizing electron density on the metal.

  Key Examples:
  1. Manganese Oxides:
  

  • MnO (Oxidation State: +2): Basic; reacts with HCl to form MnCl₂.
  • Mn₂O₇ (Oxidation State: +7): Strongly acidic; dissolves in water to form HMnO₄ (permanganic acid).

  Reactivity Trend:
  MnO < MnO₂ < Mn₂O₃ < MnO₃ < Mn₂O₇ → Increasing acidity with oxidation state. 2. Chromium Oxides:
  
  • CrO (Oxidation State: +2): Basic; hydrolyzes to Cr(OH)₂.
  • Cr₂O₃ (Oxidation State: +3): Amphoteric; dissolves in both acids and strong bases.
  • CrO₃ (Oxidation State: +6): Acidic; forms H₂CrO₄ (chromic acid) in water.

  3. Vanadium Oxides:
  

  • VO (Oxidation State: +2): Basic.
  • V₂O₅ (Oxidation State: +5): Acidic; reacts with NaOH to form vanadates (e.g., Na₃VO₄).

  Mechanism Insight:
  Higher oxidation states enhance π-backbonding between the metal and oxygen, reducing electron density on oxygen and increasing its proton affinity (acidity). Conversely, lower oxidation states leave oxygen with greater electron density, favoring hydroxide formation (basicity).
  

  General Rule:
  

  d⁰ configurations (e.g., Ti⁴⁺ in TiO₂): Highly acidic due to absence of d-electrons for backbonding.

  dⁿ configurations (e.g., Fe³⁺ in Fe₂O₃): Amphoteric or weakly acidic due to partial backbonding.

  

  Applications of Oxides in Industry and Technology

  Oxides constitute a foundational class of materials in modern industry, bridging chemical synthesis with functional performance across diverse sectors. Their versatility stems from tunable properties—such as electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, and reactivity—which are harnessed through controlled synthesis and purification. Industrially critical oxides are produced at scale using tailored thermal, chemical, or electrochemical methods, often requiring precise temperature gradients and raw material stoichiometry. This section examines the synthesis of three high-impact oxides (silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, and magnetite), their sector-specific applications, and the role of passive oxide layers in corrosion resistance, alongside a comparative analysis of natural versus synthetic variants.
  

  Synthesis Methods for Industrially Critical Oxides

  Silicon Dioxide (SiO₂)
  Silicon dioxide is synthesized via the thermal oxidation of silicon or the sol-gel process, depending on the desired phase (crystalline or amorphous). In semiconductor-grade applications, high-purity SiO₂ is produced by exposing silicon wafers to dry oxygen (O₂) or water vapor (H₂O) at 900–1200°C in a diffusion furnace. The reaction proceeds as:

  Si (s) + O₂ (g) → SiO₂ (s)

  For bulk amorphous silica (e.g., fused quartz), quartz sand (SiO₂, >99.5% purity) is melted in an electric arc furnace at 2000–2200°C, followed by rapid cooling to suppress crystallization. Purification involves acid leaching (HF for impurity removal) and repeated washing to achieve optical-grade transparency.

  Titanium Dioxide (TiO₂)
  TiO₂ is predominantly synthesized via the chloride process or sulfate process, with the former dominating due to higher purity. In the chloride route, rutile ore (TiO₂, ~95% TiO₂) is chlorinated with carbon at 800–1000°C in the presence of chlorine gas, producing TiCl₄, which is then oxidized in a 1400–1800°C flame to yield anatase or rutile phases:

  TiO₂ (s) + 2Cl₂ (g) + 2C (s) → TiCl₄ (g) + 2CO (g)
  TiCl₄ (g) + O₂ (g) → TiO₂ (s) + 2Cl₂ (g)

  Purification involves fractional distillation of TiCl₄ and controlled hydrolysis to eliminate metallic impurities (e.g., Fe, V). The sulfate process, though less common, uses titanyl sulfate (derived from ilmenite) and calcination at 900–1100°C to produce TiO₂ pigment grades.

  Magnetite (Fe₃O₄)
  Magnetite is synthesized via direct oxidation of iron or precipitation from ferrous/ferric solutions. In the high-temperature route, iron ore (Fe₂O₃) is reduced with carbon monoxide at 500–700°C under controlled oxygen partial pressure:

  3Fe₂O₃ (s) + CO (g) → 2Fe₃O₄ (s) + CO₂ (g)

  For nanoscale Fe₃O₄, coprecipitation of Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺ in alkaline media (pH 10–12) at 80–100°C yields uniform particles, followed by washing and annealing at 300–500°C to crystallize the spinel structure. Purification includes magnetic separation to remove unreacted iron and acid treatment to dissolve iron hydroxide impurities.
  

  Sector-Specific Applications of Oxides

  Oxides are integral to four key industrial sectors, where their physicochemical properties enable critical functionalities. Below are use-case breakdowns highlighting the oxide’s role and performance requirements.

  Electronics
  Silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide dominate due to their dielectric and photocatalytic properties.

  • Gate Dielectrics in Semiconductors (SiO₂)
    Silicon dioxide serves as the primary gate insulator in MOSFETs, providing high breakdown voltage (>10 MV/cm) and low leakage current. Its synthesis via thermal oxidation ensures atomic-level uniformity on silicon wafers, critical for sub-10 nm node devices. Doping with nitrogen or germanium adjusts dielectric constants (k = 3.9) to mitigate quantum tunneling effects.
  • Photocatalytic Transistors (TiO₂)
    TiO₂ in anatase phase is used in UV-sensitive transistors for gas sensing (e.g., NO₂ detection) and self-cleaning coatings. Its bandgap (3.2 eV) enables electron-hole pair generation under UV irradiation, with surface hydroxyl groups (-OH) facilitating redox reactions. Thin-film deposition via atomic layer deposition (ALD) ensures conformal coatings on flexible substrates.
  • Optical Waveguides (Fused Silica, SiO₂)
    Fused silica fibers exploit ultra-low absorption (0.2 dB/km at 1550 nm) and high thermal stability for long-distance telecommunications. Doping with germanium (GeO₂) or erbium (Er³⁺) enables signal amplification via stimulated emission, while fluorine doping reduces scattering losses in single-mode fibers.
  Ceramics
  Oxides provide mechanical strength, thermal resistance, and aesthetic properties in structural and decorative applications.
  • Bioceramics (ZrO₂, Al₂O₃)
    Zirconia (ZrO₂) with yttria stabilization (3–8 mol% Y₂O₃) exhibits toughness (9–12 MPa·m¹ᐟ²) via transformation toughening, used in dental implants and load-bearing prosthetics. Aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) in sapphire substrates offers thermal conductivity (30 W/m·K) for LED packaging and high-temperature crucibles.
  • Refractory Materials (MgO, Cr₂O₃)
    Magnesia (MgO) and chromia (Cr₂O₃) form high-temperature linings (2000–2500°C) in steel furnaces, where their low thermal expansion coefficients prevent spalling. Chromia’s corrosion resistance to molten slag extends furnace lifecycles by 3–5 years in basic oxygen steelmaking.
  • Glazes and Pigments (TiO₂, SnO₂)
    TiO₂ (rutile phase) provides opaque whiteness (hiding power) in ceramic glazes, while SnO₂ dopes with antimony (Sb) enhances electrical conductivity for heated ceramic tiles. The sol-gel method enables customizable particle sizes (50–300 nm) to adjust gloss and color stability under thermal cycling.
  Catalysis
  Oxides act as supports, active phases, or promoters in heterogeneous catalysis, where surface area and redox activity are critical.
  • Automotive Emission Control (CeO₂, Al₂O₃)
    Ceria (CeO₂) in three-way catalysts (TWCs) oscillates between Ce³⁺/Ce⁴⁺ states to store/release oxygen, optimizing CO/NOₓ/HC conversion at λ = 1 (stoichiometric air-fuel ratio). Its high oxygen storage capacity (OSC) reduces light-off temperature by 50–100°C compared to alumina-supported catalysts.
  • Petrochemical Cracking (Al₂O₃, SiO₂-Al₂O₃)
    Alumina (γ-Al₂O₃) supports zeolite catalysts (HZSM-5) in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC), where its acidic hydroxyl groups facilitate hydrocarbon isomerization. Bimodal pore structures (micro/mesoporous) enhance diffusivity of bulky intermediates, improving selectivity to gasoline-range products.
  • Water Splitting (TiO₂, WO₃)
    TiO₂ (doped with nitrogen or iron) enables photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible light (λ < 450 nm), with quantum efficiency >5% in nanostructured films. Tungsten trioxide (WO₃) in p-type semiconductors pairs with TiO₂ to form tandem cells, achieving solar-to-hydrogen efficiencies of 12–15% in laboratory settings.
  Medicine
  Oxides in biomedical applications leverage biocompatibility, antimicrobial properties, and controlled drug release.
  • Orthopedic Implants (TiO₂, HA)
    Titanium dioxide nanotubes (TiO₂-NT) on Ti-6Al-4V alloys promote osteoblast adhesion via surface roughness (10–100 nm) and localized charge effects. Hydroxyapatite (Ca₁
    

    Environmental and Biological Interactions of Oxides

    The interplay between oxides and environmental systems governs critical ecological and health outcomes, from atmospheric pollution to biological toxicity. Industrial emissions of gaseous oxides—particularly sulfur dioxide (SO₂), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), and carbon monoxide (CO)—undergo complex transformations in the atmosphere, leading to secondary pollutants like acid rain precursors. Meanwhile, engineered nanoscale oxides (e.g., ZnO, CeO₂) exploit surface reactivity to mitigate air pollution, while naturally occurring or anthropogenic oxides (e.g., PbO, As₂O₃) pose significant biological hazards. This section examines the chemical mechanisms underlying oxide-induced environmental degradation, historical case studies of oxide-related disasters, and the design principles of nanoscale oxide-based air purification systems, alongside structured toxicity profiles of high-risk oxides.
    

    Formation Mechanisms of Acid Rain Precursors from Industrial Emissions

    The generation of acid rain precursors—primarily sulfur dioxide (SO₂) and nitrogen oxides (NOₓ)—originates from high-temperature combustion processes in power plants, industrial furnaces, and vehicle exhausts. Sulfur dioxide is emitted during the combustion of sulfur-containing fuels (e.g., coal, oil), where organic sulfur (S) oxidizes to SO₂ via:

    S (fuel) + O₂ → SO₂

    In the atmosphere, SO₂ undergoes further oxidation, catalyzed by hydroxyl radicals (OH·) or transition metal ions (e.g., Mn²⁺, Fe³⁺), forming sulfur trioxide (SO₃):

    2 SO₂ + O₂ → 2 SO₃ (catalyzed by OH· or metal oxides)

    SO₃ subsequently reacts with atmospheric water vapor to produce sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄), the primary component of acid rain:

    SO₃ + H₂O → H₂SO₄

    Nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), primarily NO and NO₂, are produced during high-temperature combustion via the Zeldovich mechanism, where nitrogen (N₂) and oxygen (O₂) react:

    N₂ + O₂ → 2 NO (endothermic, favored at >1200°C)

    NO is further oxidized to NO₂ in the presence of ozone (O₃) or peroxy radicals (RO₂·):

    2 NO + O₂ → 2 NO₂

    NO₂ hydrolyzes in atmospheric water to form nitric acid (HNO₃), contributing to acidification:

    3 NO₂ + H₂O → 2 HNO₃ + NO

    The combined deposition of H₂SO₄ and HNO₃ lowers soil and water pH, disrupting aquatic ecosystems and accelerating the weathering of buildings and infrastructure. Industrial regions with high SO₂/NOₓ emissions (e.g., coal-dependent power plants) exhibit elevated acid rain incidence, with pH levels dropping below 4.0 in extreme cases.
    

    Historical Incidents of Oxide Emissions and Environmental Damage

    The environmental and health impacts of oxide emissions have been documented in several catastrophic events, where chemical reactivity and atmospheric conditions amplified toxicity. Below is a chronological overview of key incidents, highlighting the oxides involved and their mechanistic roles.
    
    1. The Great London Smog (1952)
       • Primary Oxides Involved: Sulfur dioxide (SO₂) from coal combustion, particulate matter (PM) with adsorbed SO₃/H₂SO₄.
       • Chemical Behavior: High concentrations of SO₂ (reaching 1.34 ppm) combined with fog and low temperatures (<1°C) facilitated the formation of a persistent sulfate aerosol. The reaction of SO₂ with water vapor produced sulfuric acid mist, which irritated respiratory tissues and exacerbated pre-existing conditions.
       • Outcome: Over 4,000 excess deaths were attributed to the smog, primarily due to bronchitis and pneumonia. The incident led to the Clean Air Act (1956), mandating smokeless fuels in urban areas.
    2. Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1984)
       • Primary Oxides Involved: Methyl isocyanate (MIC) decomposition products, including carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOₓ) from secondary reactions.
       • Chemical Behavior: The leakage of MIC from Union Carbide’s pesticide plant triggered hydrolysis, releasing CO₂ and CO. Subsequent reactions with atmospheric nitrogen produced NO and NO₂, which further oxidized to nitric acid (HNO₃) in the presence of moisture. The combined exposure to CO (binding hemoglobin, reducing O₂ transport) and NO₂ (causing pulmonary edema) resulted in acute toxicity.
       • Outcome: Over 3,000 deaths and 500,000+ injuries, with long-term neurological and respiratory sequelae. The incident underscored the hazards of industrial oxide emissions in confined spaces.
    3. Lake Nyos Disaster (1986)
       • Primary Oxides Involved: Carbon dioxide (CO₂) from volcanic activity, with secondary formation of nitrogen oxides (NOₓ) via thermal decomposition.
       • Chemical Behavior: A limnic eruption released CO₂-saturated water from the lake’s depths, displacing oxygen and creating an asphyxiating atmosphere. Trace NOₓ formed from high-temperature reactions in the lake’s sediments contributed to respiratory distress. The lack of oxygen (O₂ < 1%) led to immediate asphyxiation in exposed organisms.
       • Outcome: 1,700+ fatalities and livestock losses, highlighting the lethal potential of CO₂ and NOₓ in natural oxide emission events.
    4. Chernobyl Nuclear Accident (1986) – Secondary Oxide Emissions
       • Primary Oxides Involved: Nitrous oxide (N₂O), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), and cesium oxide (Cs₂O) from reactor core degradation.
       • Chemical Behavior: Graphite moderator fires produced NO₂, which reacted with atmospheric water to form nitric acid. Radioactive cesium oxides (e.g., Cs₂O) formed during core meltdown, contributing to long-term soil and water contamination. NO₂ also reacted with ammonia (NH₃) in the environment to form ammonium nitrate (NH₄NO₃), a secondary pollutant.
       • Outcome: Long-term ecological damage, with elevated nitrate (NO₃⁻) levels in groundwater and persistent radiological oxide contamination.
    These incidents demonstrate how oxide emissions—whether from industrial processes, accidents, or natural phenomena—interact with atmospheric and biological systems to produce cascading environmental and health crises.
    

    Nanoscale Oxides in Air Purification: Surface Engineering and Catalytic Mechanisms

    Nanoscale metal oxides (e.g., ZnO, CeO₂, TiO₂) are engineered for air purification by leveraging high surface-area-to-volume ratios and redox-active surfaces. Their efficacy stems from photocatalytic degradation, adsorption, and catalytic oxidation of pollutants. Below are the key design principles and mechanisms:
    
    1. Surface Area Optimization and Morphology
       • Nanoscale oxides (e.g., ZnO nanoparticles) exhibit surface areas exceeding 100 m²/g, enabling higher pollutant adsorption. Techniques such as sol-gel synthesis, hydrothermal growth, and electrospinning produce nanostructures (e.g., nanorods, nanosheets) that maximize active sites.
       • Defect engineering (e.g., oxygen vacancies in CeO₂) enhances catalytic activity by providing low-coordination sites for reactant adsorption. For instance, CeO₂ with controlled oxygen deficiencies exhibits superior NOₓ reduction efficiency.
    2. Photocatalytic Mechanisms for VOC and NOₓ Degradation
       • Under UV/visible light, semiconductor oxides (e.g., TiO₂, ZnO) generate electron-hole pairs (e⁻/h⁺) that react with adsorbed O₂ and H₂O to form reactive oxygen species (ROS):

         TiO₂ + hν → e⁻ (CB) + h⁺ (VB)
         h⁺ + H₂O → ·OH + H⁺
         e⁻ + O₂ → ·O₂⁻

         These ROS oxidize volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and NOₓ to CO₂, H₂O, and nitrate (NO₃⁻). For example, ZnO photocatalysts degrade formaldehyde

         The chemical diversity of oxides underscores their pivotal role in both innovation and sustainability, demanding a nuanced understanding of their properties. From predicting reactivity through periodic trends to mitigating environmental harm via nanoscale engineering, these compounds illustrate the intersection of chemistry, industry, and ecology. By mastering their classification, synthesis, and applications—spanning electronics to medicine—we not only advance technological frontiers but also address pressing global challenges, ensuring their potential is realized without compromising safety or efficiency.

         • environmental impact
         • industrial applications
         • material science
         • oxidation chemistry
         • periodic trends

         Leave a Comment

         Name

         Comment

         Post Comment

         Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of Backup Greatbigstory.